Posts Tagged ‘Islam’

USA and Saudi Arabia? Apples and Oranges.

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Discussions about plans to build an Islamic Community Center two blocks away from Ground Zero now include the voice of former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, who had this to say on the matter:

“There should be no mosque near Ground Zero in New York so long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia.”

I implore Gingrich, and those who share his belief, to remember that the United States of America and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are two entirely different countries, governed by fundamentally different sets of laws and principles.  A comparison of the two countries in this context is like comparing apples to oranges, making it largely illogical to have equal expectations of both.  Stephen Prothero made a similar point on the CNN Belief Blog, as did Rabbi Brad Hirschfield on the Washington Post’s On Faith blog.  Hirschfield wrote:

“Gingrich’s claim…is [an] inane unless one [and] assumes two things: A, that we should now use Saudi Arabia as our benchmark for what is appropriate as far as freedom of religious expression, and unless they are as good as we are, we need not be as good as we have traditionally been. And B, that this is a Saudi project lead by people who could change the Saudi position on religious freedom but have failed to do so.”

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is just that — a kingdom, based in Shariah Law.  The national flag of Saudi Arabia includes the Shahada, the Muslim creed that states “There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger.”  Islam is the state-established religion; in fact, according to the CIA World Factbook, Saudi Arabia’s population is 100% Muslim.

In contrast, here in the United States of America, having an established national religion is against our constitution – as a result, we are the most religiously diverse country in the world. One of our founding principles is that the government cannot show preference for one religion over another or unfairly discriminate against one faith over another, or faith over no faith.

As an American citizen, and a citizen of the world, I expect a higher level of religious tolerance and acceptance from the United States than from Saudi Arabia.  The United States of America is responsible for upholding the values and judgments it has enshrined in its crowing jewel—the Constitution.

Our own Interfaith Alliance President, Rev. Welton Gaddy, addressed the Ground Zero community center debate in his own On Faith post:

“For years, public discourse…has called for a great moderate Muslim voice to counter extremism. Now, when such a voice is seeking to be heard in meaningful and helpful ways, it faces severe backlash and strong opposition – indicating a continued fear and ignorance of the Muslim faith, even at its most peaceful.”

Reverend Gaddy also recently interviewed Daisy Khan on his weekly radio show State of Belief.  Along with her husband, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, Kahn is one of the visionaries behind the community center. I leave you with her words on the matter:

“We always take comfort is knowing that Islam’s struggle in this country is the same as the struggles of those that came before us,’ she told me last week. ‘’It’s one of acceptance. America remains shining example of religious freedom and acceptance.”

Misunderstanding and Misrepresentation in American Media

Monday, June 14th, 2010

Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies A People

Before I begin, I want to recognize that the video posted above is about media portrayals of Arabs in American Hollywood films, not Muslims. I mention this difference because although most of the people who frequent this blog undoubtedly know the difference, this claim cannot be easily generalized to include the majority of the American public.

An “Arab” is a person born and raised in an Arabic-speaking nation, one in which Arabic is the primary language taught in schools and used in public forums.  To be thorough, all nations from which citizens can be considered “Arab” are as follows: Mauritania, Western Sahara, Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, Djibouti, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan (UNESCO).  It is important to note, however, that each of these nations have their own spoken dialects based off of the standardized MSA used for reading and writing.  It is also important to note that not all peoples in these countries practice the Islamic Faith; Lebanon in particular has a relatively large population of Maronite Christians that would also be considered Arab.

“Muslim,” in contrast, is a religious designation.  A Muslim is a believer of the Islamic faith.  All Muslims do not share a primary language or live in geographically related areas.  In fact, the largest concentration of Muslims in the world is in Indonesia, nowhere near the “Arab World.”  A “Muslim country” is a nation that has assigned Islam as its official religion.

Thus, not all Muslims are Arab, and not all Arabs are Muslim.

There is so little understanding of the difference between these two terms in American popular culture that I would go so far as to say the video posted above might as well claim to represent Muslim stereotypes as well.

As a 20 year-old university student, I am often surrounded by bright, motivated, well-educated people—who rarely know the difference.    It frightens me how powerful media images can be in shaping the perceptions of Americans.  A recent article in the Washington Post by Nicole Neroulias highlighted President Barack Obama’s attempts at a initiating a “new beginning” with the Muslim World, and how it is being complicated by the images presented by movies like “Sex and the City 2.”

I agree with Neroulias’ claim that while much energy is being expended attempting to change Muslim’s view of America, little is being done to change America’s view of the Muslim and Arab worlds.   Movies like “True Lies” (1994) and “Aladdin” fill our heads with negative, violent images of Arabs (and as I have argued, Muslims).  Even movies like “American Dreamz” (2006) (that attempts to poke fun at the dramatized stereotypes) still manages to leave a bad taste in one’s mouth.

If there is to be progress in bridging the divide between the so-called “Muslim World” and the American public—in hopes of staving off a Huntington-esque “Clash of Civilizations”—attention must be paid to the way we are entertaining ourselves, and at whose expense.

Good Start, Now We Need Good Action

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

The following is cross-posted from the Washington Post/Newsweek On Faith forum:

I am delighted to hear President Obama speaking to the Muslim world in a part of the Muslim world and not just speaking about the Muslim world.  The president’s message in Turkey was precisely the message appropriate for the President of the United States to deliver anywhere and everywhere.

Frankly, I find it disturbing, as well as a bit sad, that so many people feel it necessary to congratulate the president for understanding and speaking about basic concepts of religious freedom and pluralism. No president with a constitutional conscience should say less or more than President Obama said.  A majority of United States citizens claiming Christianity as their religion does not make the United States a Christian nation.  The Constitution reflects our people’s appreciation for religion while leaving no doubt that the government of the nation is secular in nature.  Subsequently, never should the United States government go to war against any religion or on behalf of any religion.  Any time the last option of war has to be chosen to resolve an international dilemma, the target of our nation’s military action should be a foreign government entity or rogue terrorists, not a religion.

The speech was brilliant.  Now it is time for action. Speaking is not doing; words are not actions.  The president has a civil and moral responsibility to see that this nation does not seek to promote or establish any one religion or religion itself and to assure that all citizens are beneficiaries of civil rights and liberties even if they are out of step with a popular, even majority, religious point of view among other citizens.

I applaud the president’s efforts to demonstrate to the international community his strong commitment to repairing relations with foreign governments generally and with the global Muslim community specifically.  But there is also work to be done here at home.  This work, too, will deliver an important message to the rest of the world.

Too many Muslims living in this country still feel like second class citizens. Too many non-Christians in this land continue to feel like our government favors one religion over another. I appeal to President Obama to find specific ways to make clear at home his commitment to religious pluralism and to religious freedom as promised by the Constitution.

No speech or act is as influential or transformational as are consistency and continuity between a person’s words and actions.  In that regard, President Obama is off to a good start.

Cutting through the bull on Obama’s “Muslim” beliefs

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

I generally turn CNN on in the evenings and then ignore it, but my ears perked up when I heard Campbell Brown, in the “Cutting Through the Bull” segment of “Campbell Brown: Election Center” last night, say, “So what if Obama was Arab or Muslim? So what if John McCain was Arab or Muslim? Would it matter?”

Like anyone who’s read Article VI of the Constitution, my answer was a resounding “No!” Apparently Brown is also up on her Constitution knowledge, because she seemed as frustrated as I am by the implicit religious test for public office being created by the reaction to this whisper campaign about Obama’s “secret Muslim identity.” And she made some spectacular points – take a look:

Brown is right: Obama is not Muslim – although millions of patriotic Americans are – but it shouldn’t matter. What should matter are his positions on the issues at stake, and that he’s an American. Everything else is just intolerance at best, and hatred-driven prejudice at worst.

Campbell Brown may be my newest hero.

Daily News

Monday, September 29th, 2008

In today’s news:

Please keep your seats and tray tables in their full upright and locked position as we prepare for religion and politics in today’s news – from Interfaith Alliance.

Daily News

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008

In today’s news:

Religion and politics in today’s news, now available without a prescription – from Interfaith Alliance.

But they’re not part of “good public speaking” …

Monday, September 8th, 2008

Sen. Barack Obama may think he’s too cool for air quotes, but he could have used them on ABC’s This Week yesterday. In a conversation with George Stephanopoulos about rumors that Sen. Obama is Muslim, an inelegant phrase unwittingly gave ammo to the Democratic candidate’s opponents.

Think about the difference between this:

Obama: You’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith …

and this:

Obama: You’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my “Muslim faith” …

Now, clearly part of Sen. Obama’s appeal is his skillful rhetoric, and he probably would never wiggle those fingers while he was talking for fear of being sent to bed without dinner by his coterie of media trainers.

Still, a little visual indicator of his true meaning might have stopped at least some of the endless e-mail rehashes of the YouTube video accompanied by breathless “OMG it’s proof of the cover-up!” messages that went around today.

And it bears repeating … What exactly is wrong with being a Muslim anyway? Nothing.

Blessed Ramadan to our Muslim friends who are fasting today and through the end of the month.

Anti-Muslim Voting Guide

Thursday, August 28th, 2008

A grateful hat-tip to the good folks over at Religion Clause for this story.

An evangelical Christian group calling themselves Truth For Muslims has published a voter (mis-)guide that attempts to “educate YOU about one of the most crucial issues facing America:”

A sinking economy? Loss of American diplomatic power? A warming planet?  Of course not!

“…the rising influence of Islam.”

Insofar as Islam is concerned, the ideal candidate (“TIC”) will be one who knows history and understands Islam in its historical context over time. He readily sees that Islam is incompatible with the United States Constitution, Biblical Christianity, and basic Western democracy.

It never ceases to amaze me how many times people invoke the Constitution without having any idea what it actually says.  Separation of church and state?  No religious test for office? Anybody home?

It only gets worse from there, including perpetuation of the lie that Barack Obama is a Muslim.  You can read the full voter (mis-)guide here, but I’m warning you it will churn the stomach a little.

Listen Now