Posts Tagged ‘gay marriage’

Prop 8 Ruling Good for Religious Freedom

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

In yesterday’s landmark decision, Judge Vaughn Walker of California’s District Court struck down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional.  Unsurprisingly, there have been strong reactions from the religious community both in favor of and opposing the decision.  State of Belief host and Interfaith Alliance President Rev. Welton Gaddy welcomed the decision as a positive step for California, the nation as a whole, and religious freedom.  In his statement, Rev. Gaddy said:

“We are pleased to see that Judge Vaughn Walker was sensitive to the concerns of people of faith who oppose same-gender marriage on religious grounds but that he recognized, as do we, that their religious freedom will not be impacted by the legalization of same-gender marriage. America’s diverse religious landscape leaves room for a variety of theological perspectives on same-gender marriage; indeed, some faiths enthusiastically support it and others vehemently oppose it. Under this ruling, as with any constitutionally-based marriage equality law, no religion would ever be required to condone same-gender marriage, and no member of the clergy would ever be required to perform a wedding ceremony not in accordance with his or her religious beliefs.”

The separation between institutions of religion and government in America was not an accident, it was by design—for the good of both religion AND government.  Our First Amendment makes it constitutionally wrong to deny an individual certain rights because of a religion’s theology concerning what is moral, ethical, or correct.  Divorce is not recognized by the Catholic Church, but it is still the right of an American citizen to dissolve a marriage legally in the eyes of the state.   Judge Walker’s decision takes same-gender marriage out of the religious sphere and into the legal one; his judgment is grounded in law put in place to serve the best interests of this country.  His decision articulates that one couple’s same-gender marriage does not pose harm or threat to another person’s existence or religious beliefs, thus does not warrant its banning.

As I write this,  Rev. Gaddy is continuing our work on same-gender marriage as he is preparing to speak at the Salt Lake Sunstone Symposium for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints on the importance of shifting the conversation on LGBT equality from a place of “problem” to “solution,” from a scriptural argument to a religious freedom agreement.

For other reactions to Judge Walker’s decision, click here.

Students at Liberty find none

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

James Madison must be exhausted. The poor guy just can’t catch a break – with all of the government interference in religion (the faith-based initiative-turned-partnership) and religious interference in politics (Propositions 8, 102 and 2), he’s probably been rolling over in his grave nonstop for years.

The latest offense against religious freedom is Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University deciding to kick its chapter of College Democrats off-campus, a decision they announced late last week.

Usually when you hear about a student organization getting kicked off-campus, it’s a Greek that’s had its charter revoked for hazing. At Liberty, it’s apparently the desire for two-sided political discourse that will get you asked to leave.

Liberty University, which shares the conservative Christian views of its founder, Jerry Falwell, didn’t approve the presence of any student group affiliated with the Democratic Party (although College Republicans has been a presence on campus for some time) until this past October, when they recognized a chapter of College Democrats. Recognition was granted on the condition that its members would support neither gay marriage nor abortion – two issues that are major no-nos at Liberty.

The students say they’ve held up their end of the bargain. Unfortunately, Liberty’s powers-that-be have decided that endorsing candidates – something the College Republicans also practice and is in the College Democrats’ constitution, which its president, Brian Diaz, says was approved by the university – who “clearly promoted abortion” violates their agreement, and have revoked their recognition of the student organization.

Legally, Liberty has done nothing wrong. They’re a private institution, and as such they can make whatever decisions they want about student organizations.

But (and let me just insert here that I would be making the same argument if this were a liberal college denying its students a College Republicans chapter) one of the purposes of a college education is to teach you to discuss things – important things, big things, change-the-world things – with your peers. Those who agree with you, and those who don’t. In the real world, your peers aren’t limited to far-right conservatives who vehemently oppose both a woman’s right to choose and the (future, I hope) right of any couple to be married by the government. In the real world, you have to learn how to express your opinion, your reasoning for believing as you do and your rationale for disagreeing with “the opposition” – and be civil about it. (Not to mention that in the ivory tower of academia, rational discourse and the exchange of ideas are supposed to be sacred.)

Liberty has a perfect right to do what they did – but choosing to do so shows their poor sportsmanship, small-mindedness and fear of anything beyond the extremely limited scope of their definition of the norm.

Don’t Impose Theology on Those Who Hold a Different Point of View

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

The following is cross-posted at On Faith

Whether or not there a religious or scriptural basis for gay marriage depends entirely upon who is answering that question as well as the religious background of the respondent and the methodology of his/her scriptural interpretation. One of the great blessings of the religious freedom embraced and guaranteed by the United States Constitution is every person’s right to believe or not to believe when it comes to religion generally and, if one believes, to decide specifically in whom or in what to believe.

Lisa Miller has provided a thought-provoking analysis of the Bible’s take on gay marriage from the perspective of one interpreter. Undoubtedly, her words will provide great comfort to many in the GLBT community who have often found themselves alienated form faith communities because of more traditional interpretations of what the Bible says about homosexuality. At the same time, Miller’s analysis is no more or less valid than one that opposes gay marriage.

When it comes to the question of gay marriage, the goal should not be to demand that people change their theology. A far better goal is to ask people not to attempt to impose their theology on those who hold a different theological point of view. Marriage–gay or heterosexual–should be a right available to every citizen, but never a legal act, ritual, or formal ceremony that any house of worship, denomination, or religious leader should be required to perform in contradiction to their beliefs.

Daily News

Tuesday, August 12th, 2008

Time for a healthy dose of your daily news:

  • Religious Right activists in Ohio urge McCain not to choose Romney as VP. Also check out another ringing endorsement for the presumptive nominee: “McCain wouldn’t have been our person.” [Columbus Dispatch]
  • Book chronicling Barack Obama’s faith to be released later this month. Yet another development in the race for Pastor-in-Chief. [Detroit Free Press]
  • New poll out finds Obama leading among 18 of 19 different faith groups. But check out the polling methodology – not exactly conventional. [Christian Post]
  • Remember the gay marriage initiatives in 2004 that were placed on the ballot to help President Bush’s chances? It’s deja vu all over again. [New York Times]
  • Debate raging in South Carolina over Christian license plate, which begs the WWJD question (What would Jesus drive?). [The State]
  • Man posing as bishop charging cash for performing illegitimate sacraments. Police say he is armed (with the body of Christ) and dangerous (to salvation). [Dallas Morning News]

Religion and politics news, now with extra flouride, brought to you by the Interfaith Alliance.

Daily News

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

It’s time for a generous helping of your religion and politics news:

  • Cathleen Falsani argues Obama should not need to pass a litmus test to be a “real” Christian. Don’t forget the Constitution gives us an answer on this too. [Chicago Sun-Times].
  • Ask the presidential candidates where they stand on gay marriage and they will claim the building is on fire and run away from the controversy. [NPR]
  • Martin Luther King Jr. once said the most segregated hour in America was Sunday morning at 11 AM. Unfortunately, not much has changed. [CNN]
  • New list details the colleges with the most religious students and the fewest religious students. [Christian Post]
  • Guess who said this (besides Rev. Gaddy): “I have never heard anybody ask a candidate, ‘What is your view of the Constitution?’” The answer may surprise you. [NPR]

Religion and politics news, now with a powerful decongestant, brought to you by the Interfaith Alliance.

Listen Now